Smug White Liberal Chris Hayes Compares Climate Change To Civil War, Untapped Oil Reserves To Slaves

Of course, it was first far-Left liar Al Gore who dissed Black ancestry and everyone who has a slave in their family history by comparing faux global warming to slavery about a year ago. But since white liberals have done a great job brainwashing black Americans into voting Democratic (and hence their unGodly agenda that does nothing to benefit blacks) and accepting victimhood for decades now, the silence you hear is that of no prominent member of the black, race-baiting crowd speaking out against a prick like Hayes:

MSNBC’s host of Up, Chris Hayes, joined the NOW panel on Friday where he noted that there has been a conspicuous lack of interest in the issue of climate change this election cycle. Hayes said that, while there is a sense among politicians that there is a limited political benefit in putting forward a plan to address climate change, opposition to addressing that problem among fossil fuel producers cannot be discounted. He compared the fossil fuel industry to the antebellum South and the potential wealth represented by untapped oil and gas reserves to pre-Civil War slaves.

In a discussion about the lack of interest by both parties this election cycle about the issue of climate change, BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith noted that the poor recovery has created antipathy to addressing climate change among Democrats who represent districts with a significant coal mining industry.

Hayes agreed, and said that politicians were only part of the reason why climate change has slipped off the political radar this cycle. The fossil fuel industry represents the other side of that coin.

“The only historical analog for the amount of money that’s on the line – in terms of the fossil fuel industry – is the sum total value that the slaves represented in the civil war,” said Hayes. “That is the analogy you have to go back to when you think of the current present value of the fossil fuel reserves that are on the books of the current fossil fuel companies. The last time that that much wealth was at stake was when the South fought the civil war.” 

RELATED: Chris Hayes Compares Climate Change To The Struggle To End Slavery

MSNBC's Chris Hayes Disses All Soldiers, Says He's 'Uncomfortable' Calling Fallen Troops 'Heroes'

It's no secret that MSNBC (not including Joe Scarborough) is a tool of the "progressive" Left, but dissing the men and women who volunteer to serve our country and risk their lives fighting for our country? That's just beyond stupid. Any wonder why soldiers these days will most likely vote Republican in November? Why vote for a Democrat president that supports an ideology that constantly ridicules, belittles and criticizes your sacrifice while standing safely on the land you battle to protect. Whose the real cowards again?

It’s Memorial Day weekend, and while many may be marking this occasion as a time for barbecuing with the family, it’s also an important time to reflect on the sacrifice of those who lost their lives serving the country. We like to remember them as heroes, men and women who risk everything to protect their fellow citizens, but on MSNBC today, Chris Hayes admitted he feels “uncomfortable” about doing that, suggesting the “hero” label gives us more rhetorical reasons to continue the wars.


Hayes observed that in much casual conversation about war and fallen soldiers, talk of heroism often comes up, and he doesn’t necessarily think that’s a good thing.

“I feel… uncomfortable, about the word because it seems to me that it is so rhetorically proximate to justifications for more war. Um, and, I don’t want to obviously desecrate or disrespect memory of anyone that’s fallen, and obviously there are individual circumstances in which there is genuine, tremendous heroism, you know, hail of gunfire, rescuing fellow soldiers, and things like that. But it seems to me that we marshal this word in a way that is problematic. But maybe I’m wrong about that.”

Columnist John McWhorter agreed with Hayes’ discomfort because the word “hero” and others like it can be used as “argumentational strategies” whether we are consciously aware of that or not. Hayes did acknowledge the other side of the argument, namely that there is no mandatory conscription and service is purely voluntary, therefore all those who choose to sign up and take heavy risks are heroes in their own right.


Michelle Goldberg, columnist for The Daily Beast, argued that the reason “hero” comes across as a loaded word is that it implies “they died in the pursuit of a worthy endeavor.” But see, I don’t think that’s the case. I’m sure there are many people who would disagree with U.S. military interventionist policy who recognize that the troops are just people following orders and doing their jobs under difficult circumstances. As fellow panelist Liliana Segura noted, people can certainly make the obvious distinction between the policy and the troops.


There’s nothing wrong with remembering the fallen as heroes. I can’t imagine the kind of courage it takes to voluntarily take a position with the understanding that you could die at any moment.

RELATED: Video: MSNBC observes Memorial Day