Saturday, August 13, 2011

Gay Mafia Attempts To Force "Sesame Street" To Gay Marry Ernie And Bert


If there's a space somewhere to push their morally bankrupt, sexually perverted agenda down the throats of children everywhere, the mostly white, male-dominated gay mafia will find it. And that includes Sesame Street, a classic show that kids everywhere have watched at one time or another, yes folks even when it comes to puppets there's a chance politicize and more importantly indoctrinate:
Some people see politics everywhere, even where they don't belong.


Case in point a Chicago-area man who, according to Washington, D.C. radio station WMAL, has started an online petition at a website called Change.org seeking to pressure the people behind the landmark children's program Sesame Street to "let Ernie & Bert get married."


As a child—and as a parent—I watched a lot of Sesame Street. I'm a big fan of Bert & Ernie and their antics. I can still sing most of the lyrics to "Rubber Duckie" and "Doin' the Pigeon" from memory. They are funny, engaging characters who demonstrate to children that people—no matter how different they might be in temperament, likes, dislikes and personalities—can still be the best of friends. But they are also, as apparently has been lost on some people, Muppets—a combination marionette and foam rubber puppet invented decades ago—by the legendary Jim Henson and his wife Jane. Muppets are not people, and while they are in many cases gender specific they, as the Sesame Workshop felt compelled to point out Thursday, "Do not have a sexual orientation." Nonetheless someone out there thinks they would be useful to further a point about sexual identity.


It's an idea that's foolish, and moreover, culturally destructive because, if enacted, it would further the end of childhood innocence in America. Children are already bombarded, in and out of school, with messages and meanings that, in my judgment, are far too sophisticated for them to comprehend. Instead, they just confuse and, in some cases, scare them—as was the case when, as the Boston Globe reported back in 2009, "an anxious, depressed 17-year-old boy was admitted to the psychiatric unit at the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne."


"He was refusing to drink water. Worried about drought related to climate change, the young man was convinced that if he drank, millions of people would die. The Australian doctors wrote the case up as the first known instance of climate change delusion,'" the paper reported.


A 17-year-old man is far more mature than the average viewer of Sesame Street. We have an obligation to protect innocents and innocence and, in a sense, childhood itself. Children are treasures, precious gems that are our future and should be treated as such, not as targets for indoctrination.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Sarah Palin Speaks On Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann And GOP Race



RELATED: Palin at the Fair: I’m Surprised Perry’s Running After Saying He Wasn’t

U.S. Appeals Court Rules Against ObamaCare



FoxNews.com:
A federal appeals court in Atlanta ruled Friday that a provision in President Obama's health care law requiring citizens to buy health insurance is unconstitutional, but the court didn't strike down the rest of the law.


The decision is a major setback for the White House, which had appealed a ruling by a lower court judge who struck down the entire law in January. But given that another appeals court, in Cincinnati, has upheld the law, it is increasingly clear that the Supreme Court will have the final say.


"We strongly disagree with this decision and we are confident it will not stand," White House spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said in a statement.


On Friday, the divided three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with 26 states that filed a lawsuit to block Obama's signature domestic initiative. The panel said that Congress exceeded its constitutional authority by requiring Americans to buy insurance or face penalties.


"This economic mandate represents a wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority," the panel said in the majority opinion.


The majority also said that a basic objective of the law is to "make health insurance coverage accessible and thereby to reduce the number of uninsured persons." Without the individual mandate, the majority said, the law "retains many other provisions that help to accomplish some of the same objectives as the individual mandate."

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Far-Left Activist George Soros Accused Of Beating And Choking Girlfriend


Mediaite.com:
Liberal businessman and financier George Soros is facing legal trouble over a promise he allegedly broke to his ex-girlfriend, a Brazilian soap opera star named Adriana Ferreyr (You can check out her IMDB page here.) Ferreyr, shown here on a trip with Soros last December, has filed a $50 million lawsuit against her ex, alleging that he slapped and choked her while the two argued about an apartment he’d promised her on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.


According to the suit, Sorors dumped Ferreryr after five years of dating. The two then reconciled briefly, at which point Soros leaned over to Ferreyr while in bed and whispered that he’d given the apartment he’d promised her on 30 E. 85th St. to another woman. And that’s when, the actress alleges, the proverbial dookie hit the proverbial fan. She says Soros proceeded to slap her and choke her. Then, he allegedly tried to hit her with a glass lamp, which ended up breaking on the floor and cutting her foot, resulting in three stitches.


Police were called, but no charges were filed. Soros’ lawyer tells the New York Post that police “investigated the… incident referred to and concluded that no assault occurred… George Soros did not slap, choke or throw a lamp at her.”


Later, Soros allegedly apologized and offered to buy Ferreyr another multi-million apartment… only to break his promise once again.
Let's see how much attention this gets from the MSM. Then too, I always assumed that Soros was teh ghey.

Confirmed: Rick Perry Is Running For President


And Perry's already tied with Romney for the GOP lead:
Texas Gov. Rick Perry is running for president, a spokesman confirmed Thursday, a move certain to shake up the race for the Republican nomination much to the delight of conservatives looking for a candidate to embrace.


Perry spokesman Mark Miner said the governor would make his intentions known on Saturday while visiting the crucial early primary states of South Carolina and New Hampshire just as most of his presidential rivals compete in a test vote in another key state, Iowa.


Official word of Perry's entrance into the race came just hours before eight candidates, including Republican front-runner Mitt Romney, were to appear on stage during a nationally televised debate.


On Sunday, Perry will speak at a Republican fundraiser in Iowa for the Black Hawk County Republicans, his campaign confirmed to the CBS News earlier this week. His decision to travel to the crucial first-in-the-nation voting state signals that he plans to compete aggressively there for the Republican presidential nomination.


Perry's entry into the race is sure to draw attention away from the Iowa straw poll in Ames on Saturday, which traditionally has a significant impact on the Republican presidential race. Perry is not on the straw poll ballot.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Sheryl Swoopes Announces Marriage To Man After Coming Out As Gay


NewsOne.com:
Sheryl Swoopes, a three-time WNBA MVP, who came out as a lesbian six years ago has announced that she will be marrying a man.


Swoopes was previously married to a man, her high school sweetheart, with whom she had a son with before coming out as a lesbian in 2005; announcing her relationship with Alisa Scott, a former WNBA assistant coach.


The Root reports:


Six years after three-time WNBA MVP Sheryl Swoopes came out, announcing her relationship with then-girlfriend Alisa Scott, she has announced that she’s engaged … to a man. Cue the confusion. She’s been called everything from “no longer” a lesbian to NSGAA (“not so gay after all”)
Of course, those who still believe the bullshit about there being a "gay gene" will argue that in Swoopes case it somehow "split" down the middle, causing Swoopes to really be bisexual. But that would ignore the fact that even Swoopes has said herself that being in a relationship with a woman for several years was a "choice" she made and that she wasn't "born gay"--more reason for sane people around the world to understand and know that the main reason the gay movement uses the "born this way" spiel is because that argument provides them with the tools they need to gain "civil rights"--in other words, by saying that God created you this way, naive idiots around the world will sympathize with you and want to afford you "rights" based solely on un-Godly sexual behavior.

As for Sheryl Swoopes now being engaged to a man, when there are so many good, Christian, single women out there yearning for good men, it's sad to see a man make a choice to be with a morally bankrupt, clearly confused woman like Swoopes--but then so many men are turned on by "bisexual" women that they have problem seeking relationships with one. That said, my advise to any person seeking to leave the homosexual lifestyle is to take some time off from relationships with people altogether, renounce your past sins and seek a relationship with God first, after that the rest will be gravy.

Tuesday, August 09, 2011

Megyn Kelly Rips Newsweek’s Bachmann Cover: Female Pols Either ‘Nuts Or Sluts’



Mediaite.com:
This afternoon, America Live’s Megyn Kelly tackled the mounting controversy surrounding Newsweek’s rather odd choice of picture and headline for its cover profile on GOP presidential hopeful and Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann. Some conservatives, as well as the National Organization of Women (NOW), are speaking out against the cover, calling it sexist and politically biased. Kelly brought on the Daily Caller’s Caroline May to discuss the outcry.


When, Kelly asked, was the last time anyone has heard of NOW aligning with conservatives?


It’s rare, and when they do do it, they have some sort of caveat to go along with it, but it’s really striking that they went ahead and took Bachmann’s defense this time around. They’ve been having a lot of attacks against her and, I mean I think it’s just the final straw. She’s been, you know, in the spotlight and she’s being hit for it.


May had actually been able to speak with the head of NOW to obtain a clearer view of why the group was denouncing the Newsweek cover:


Terry O’Neill, she said what they look for is Gloria Steinem’s test: If this were done to a man, or if it ever could have been done to a man, then it’s not considered sexist. But because, obviously, this is… She’s labeled a “queen” and put as crazy, it’s more sexist.


Kelly then very succinctly wrapped up the central issue at play in this story into a neat little phrase we’ll personally be borrowing this week:


We’ve talked before on the program about how certain women politicians — it’s not limited to conservative women, but you see that often — get deemed (and pardon the terms, folks) as either “nuts or sluts” when they’re running for office.
When even NOW gets in on the matter and starts defending sexist treatment against a conservative woman you know have a problem. The irony of all this is the lack of outrage towards Tina Brown, the woman who now runs Newsweek.

Scott Walker's Collective Bargaining Law Will Save Milwaukee Millions In Health-care costs


WeeklyStandard.com:
"Milwaukee gains more than it loses in budget bill," reads the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel headline. And so you understand why unions are in such a rush to hold recall elections before voters see the benefits of Wisconsin's new law:


Despite early criticism from city officials, new figures show Milwaukee will gain more than it will lose next year from the state's controversial budget and budget-repair legislation.


The city projects it will save at least $25 million a year - and potentially as much as $36 million in 2012 - from health care benefit changes it didn't have to negotiate with unions, as a result of provisions in the 2009-'11 budget-repair measure that ended most collective bargaining for most public employees.


That saving would be partly offset by about $14 million in cuts in state aid to the city in the 2011-'13 state budget, down from earlier estimates of more than $17 million.


As a result, the city would come out with a net gain of at least $11 million for its 2012 budget, slicing into the "structural deficit" created by costs rising faster than revenue, and reducing the spending cuts that Mayor Tom Barrett and the Common Council must impose.


That outlook contrasts sharply with Barrett's initial comments in March, after Gov. Scott Walker and the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau released figures on the extent of the aid cuts in Walker's budget.


At that time, Barrett said the combination of aid cuts, rising expenses, a property tax levy freeze and exempting public safety workers from health care and pension benefit changes "just makes our structural deficit explode."
RELATED: Recall Elections To Determine Wis. Senate Control

Monday, August 08, 2011

Super Rich Scam Artist Al Gore Screams About Global-Warming Skeptics



Hotair.com:
Via Fox Nation. Four years ago, when he won the Nobel, 71 percent said they believed that carbon emissions were causing global warming. Four years later, after a crushing recession, Climategate, and an epic failure at Copenhagen, only 44 percent say they believe it. Meanwhile, 69 percent say it’s likely that global-warming scientists have falsified climate research. What you’re hearing here, in other words, is the voice of a man who’s very, very frustrated, not merely because the science is being questioned but because the dream of a global agreement to limit industrial growth isn’t a priority in a world frantic for economic growth of any sort, industrial or otherwise. To that end, if you missed it in June, read Walter Russell Mead’s three-part series (one, two, and three) on Gore’s green travails. Part one deals with the eternal “do as I say, not as I do” problem; part three tries to contextualize him within the tradition of southern liberalism. Part two gets to the heart of it:


The dream that the menace of global warming will cause humanity to overcome its ancient divisions and unite in a grand global coalition is sophomoric. Rising CO2 levels will not cause the world’s governments to accept and enforce international policing of the most intimate details of their economic lives. If the menace of nuclear war can’t create world government, the menace of global warming won’t do it either…


Mr. Gore’s work up to and including his latest Rolling Stone essay has taken a demagogic rather than intellectual approach. His method of arguing is to trumpet the science of climate change and to make ad hominem arguments against its opponents. The science is clear, it is settled, and the opposition against it is funded by people with an economic stake in denial. I am right about the science and my opponents are a bunch of evil opportunists in it only for the money…


The green movement’s core tactic is not to “hide the decline” or otherwise to cook the books of science. Its core tactic to cloak a comically absurd, impossibly complex and obviously impractical political program in the authority of science. Let anyone attack the cretinous and rickety construct of policies, trade-offs, offsets and bribes by which the greens plan to govern the world economy in the twenty first century, and they attack you as an anti-science bigot.


To argue with these people about science is to miss the core point. Even if the science is exactly as Mr. Gore claims, his policies are still useless.


Could be. Or maybe if he rants just loudly and long enough, with lots of personal derision towards those who question this scheme, the skeptics will start to see the light. No.

Politiks As Usual: In The News 8/8/11


Slain Navy SEALs Had Targeted Known Taliban Leader, Officials Say

Congress Has Chance To Pass Bills That Would Create Jobs

Timothy Geithner: S&P Showed Terrible Judgment, Obama Sticking By

Schooling Matt Damon

New Obamacare Violations Of Personal Liberty

Producers Pick Lesbian Kiss, R-Rated Movies As Teen Choice Award Nominees

Rick Perry At Prayer Rally: 'Father, Our Heart Breaks For America'

Canadian Lutherans Struggle Over 'Gay' Marriage

Newsweek Puts Picture Of Michele Bachmann On Cover That Makes Her Look Crazy

Obama: Time For An Apology

An Interracial Fix For Black Marriage

Sunday, August 07, 2011

Bob Schieffer To David Axelrod On Downgrade: ‘Are You Saying The President Bears No Responsibility?’



Shocking:
Don’t count on President Obama’s campaign advisor David Axelrod being eager to return to Face the Nation anytime soon. First Bob Schieffer persistently wondered why Obama should be re-elected when the economic situation is “worse” today than it was when Obama first took office. And later in the same interview, Schieffer refuses to let Axelrod blame Republicans for being the sole cause of the S&P downgrade.


After Axelrod attempted to argue that it was Republican brinkmanship and a refusal to compromise that resulted in the S&P decision, Schieffer asked in a state of a shock, “are you saying that the President bears no responsibility for this, that this was all the fault of the other side?” Axelrod, getting visibly frustrated replied:


“Listen Bob what I’m saying is review the history of what happened here . . . this is essentially a Tea Party downgrade. The Tea Party brought us to the brink of a default.”


Yet Schieffer was not impressed with Axelrod’s attempt to label it a “Tea Party Downgrade” and to switch topics to how all the potential Republican presidential candidates failed to endorse any type of debt compromise. Instead Schieffer corrected Axelrod, reminding him that actually Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman did publicly support a compromise.