Showing posts with label War on Terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War on Terror. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Russian Leaders Laugh At Barack Obama


But then I imagine it'd be hard for any world leader to respect a Godless, far-Left, mom jeans-wearing POTUS who throws like a girl:
Russia’s deputy prime minister laughed off President Obama’s sanction against him today  asking “Comrade @BarackObama” if “some prankster” came up with the list.

The Obama administration hit 11 Russian and Ukrainian officials with sanctions today as punishment for Russia’s support of Crimea’s referendum. Among them: aides to President Vladimir Putin, a top government official, senior lawmakers, Crimean officials, the ousted president of Ukraine, and a Ukrainian politician and businessman allegedly tied to violence against protesters in Kiev.

It remains to be seen whether the sanctions will dissuade Russia from annexing Crimea, but one an early clue that they will not be effective came just hours later when President Putin signed a decree recognizing Crimea as an independent state, perhaps an early step towards annexation.

U.S. official have warned of additional sanctions for Russian action, hoping it will deter Russia from any further aggression towards Ukraine, but it didn’t appear to upset the often outspoke Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin.
Rogozin, a friend of actor Steven Seagal,  took to Twitter to tweak Obama, tweeting  he thinks “some prankster” came up with the sanctions list.

In a later tweet addressed to “Comrade @BarackObama,” he asked, “what should do those who have neither accounts nor property abroad? Or U didn’t think about it?”

Another Russian on the sanctions list, Vladislav Surkov, also seemed unconcerned.

Surkov,  a top Putin ideologue often called the Kremlin’s grey cardinal, reportedly told a Russian newspaper, “It’s a big honor for me. I don’t have accounts abroad. The only things that interest me in the U.S. are Tupac Shakur, Allen Ginsberg, and Jackson Pollock. I don’t need a visa to access their work. I lose nothing.”

Here’s who gets hit with the sanctions:

U.S. officials said that, among the sanctioned individuals were the “key ideologists and architects” of Russia’s Ukraine policy, while adding that some of the Russian officials were included in the list for their role in curbing “human rights and liberties” in Russia.

The sanctions freeze any assets under American jurisdiction and prevent American banks from doing business with the named individual, essentially freezing them out of the international banking system. The sanctions also impose a ban on their travel to the United States. Separately, but in coordination with the White House, the European Union announced sanctions today on 21 individuals that it plans to name later. U.S. officials told reporters that the American and European lists “overlapped” in some area, but declined to say how.

While some of the sanctioned officials are bold faced names, the White House move is unlikely to affect Russia’s decision making with regard to Crimea’s bid to join the Russian Federation. Russia’s stock market actually improved on the news that so few officials were included on the list. U.S. officials warned that, if Russia does go ahead with annexation of Crimea, additional penalties will follow, with more, harsher measures to come if Russia attempts to enter eastern Ukraine.
RELATED:  Russian Policy and American Timidity

Monday, January 13, 2014

Robert Gates: ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Fight Was Only Time Obama Showed ‘Passion’ For Military Issues


Of course it was, when you're nothing but a mascot for the white and Godless Left, the only time you get hype is when you succeed in doing their bidding:
Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates sharply questions President Obama's "passion" for military matters in his forthcoming memoir, and claims that practically the only time he saw that in the president was during his push to repeal "don't ask, don't tell." 

The former Pentagon chief said in an interview aired Sunday that he was "disturbed" by Obama's "absence of passion" when it came to his military strategy. But in the book, "Duty," reviewed by Fox News, Gates hit Obama harder -- and in personal terms -- by contrasting his style with that of former President George W. Bush. 

"One quality I missed in Obama was passion, especially when it came to the two wars," Gates wrote. "In my presence, Bush -- very unlike his father -- was pretty unsentimental. But he was passionate about the war in Iraq; on occasion, at a Medal of Honor ceremony or the like, I would see his eyes well up. I worked for Obama longer than Bush, and I never saw his eyes well up." 

Gates went on to suggest that the president was far more emotional about repealing "don't ask, don't tell" -- the policy barring openly gay people from serving in the military -- and passing the health care bill. 

He wrote that "the only military matter, apart from leaks, about which I ever sensed deep passion on his part was 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' For him, changing the law seemed to be the inevitable next step in the civil rights movement. He presumably was also passionate about health care reform, but I wasn't present for those discussions."
RELATED: What Gates' book gets right, wrong about Obama, Biden, Afghanistan

Wednesday, January 08, 2014

Barack Obama's Afghan Leadership Blasted By His Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates


Newsmax.com:
President Barack Obama lacked belief in his administration's policy toward the war in Afghanistan and was skeptical it would even succeed, his former defense secretary, Robert Gates, writes in a memoir to be published next week.

Gates, who served as Pentagon chief from 2006 to 2011 under Obama and his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush, is critical of Obama's leadership on several defense-related issues, especially Afghanistan, according to a review of "Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War" in the Washington Post on Tuesday.

According to the Post, Gates wrote that he concluded by early 2010 that Obama, who had ordered his own troop "surge" in Afghanistan like Bush's in the Iraq war, "doesn't believe in his own strategy, and doesn't consider the war to be his. For him, it's all about getting out."

Gates adds that Obama was "skeptical if not outright convinced it (the administration strategy) would fail," according to the Post.

"I never doubted Obama's support for the troops, only his support for their mission," Gates writes.

After Obama was elected in 2008 to succeed Bush, Gates agreed to the new president's request that he remain as defense secretary, becoming the first Pentagon chief to serve presidents of different parties.

Gates describes Obama as "a man of personal integrity" and says later in his memoir that "Obama was right" in his decisions regarding Afghanistan.

But Obama was uncomfortable with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan he inherited from the Bush administration and distrustful of the military that was providing him options, Gates writes.

According to the Post's account of the book, the different worldviews of Obama and Gates "produced a rift, that at least for Gates, became personally wounding and impossible to repair."
RELATED: White House disputes Gates memoir claims

Rand Paul Responds to Barack Obama, Peter King Taking Shots at Him on Unemployment, NSA


Mediaite.com:
During his big speech on unemployment Tuesday, President Obama took a veiled shot at Rand Paul for arguing that extended unemployment benefits would not help fix unemployment. Paul responded on The Steve Malzberg Show Tuesday, firing back at Obama’s “big-hearted, small-brained policy statements.”

Paul charged that Democrats “don’t truly care about the unemployed” and all they have is emotional arguments because “their policies haven’t worked.” Malzberg added that the Democrats are “demagoguing this issue,” and found it odd they’re treating millions of unemployed people as a travesty but brushed aside the millions whose insurance plans were trashed as a result of new health care standards.

Paul also addressed Republican congressman Peter King accusing him of not caring if Americans die as the result of a terrorist attack because of his class-action lawsuit against the NSA. Paul said, “I think there’ll always be people who succumb to fear and are ready and willing to trade their liberty for security.” 

He also said that politicians like King simply “don’t seem to be concerned about your liberty.”
RELATED:  Veterans feel sting of Ramadi and Fallujah losses

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

House Intel Chairman Mike Rogers on New York Times Benghazi Report: 'That Story Is Just Not Accurate'

Newsbusters.org:
The New York Times on Sunday published a highly controversial report claiming the September 2012 attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, did not involve al Qaeda, and was as the Administration originally stated a spontaneous demonstration in response to an American-made anti-Islamic video.

Appearing on Fox News Sunday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) completely refuted the article saying, "[T]hat story is just not accurate"

It sure is interesting that Wallace would go there with Rogers, as people all over the Internet have been making the same accusation that the Times is trying to rewrite history to give cover to Hillary Clinton's involvement in this matter.

Conservative talk show host Monica Crowley tweeted about this Sunday:

Monica Crowley @MonicaCrowley

So just as I predicted & right on schedule, the leftist press is moving its protection racket from Obama to Rodham. cc @NYTimes

RELATED: Editor Wants to Make it Very, Very Clear NY Times ‘Has Not Chosen’ Hillary Clinton

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 12/22/13

Cracker Barrel Reverses Decision, Will Resume Selling Duck Dynasty Products

As Utah Gay Couples Celebrate Marriages, All Eyes On US Appeals Court

Doubling the Minimum Wage Actually Hurts Employees

Katie Couric's Oprah Try Fails, Kathy Griffin Back on CNN for New Year's Bash

Homo-fascists Are Overplaying Their Hand With Duck Dynasty

Obama Warns South Sudan

Paul Ryan Doubles Down on Cutting Veteran Pensions

Who Are You To Judge Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson?

Atheist-Funded Group Behind Attack on Koch Foundation Donation to Catholic U.

Research Shows TV Shows Underrating Violence

Douglas County Sheriff Will No Longer Cooperate with A&E in Filming 'Duck Dynasty'

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Larry Klayman Takes Down CNN's Don Lemon Over NSA Surveillance Lawsuit



Politico.com:
Conservative legal activist Larry Klayman got into an argument on CNN with host Don Lemon and legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin when he was brought on to discuss his victory this week in a lawsuit challenging NSA surveillance, resulting in Lemon cutting him off the screen and Klayman comparing Lemon to disgraced former MSNBC host Martin Bashir.

Klayman’s appearance Tuesday night on CNN was preceded by a profile of him that included a quotation from a former George W. Bush staffer saying his lawsuits were about “fighting for himself and his own, in my opinion, delusions of grandeur.”

When Klayman was brought into the conversation, he came out firing.

“I think it is important to note that you’re a big supporter of Obama,” Klayman said to Lemon. “That you have favored him in every respect. You have to try to do a hit piece to diminish a very important decision.”

Lemon interjected to clarify that Klayman was speaking about him personally, saying, “None of that is true, but go on.”

“Well, it is true. I’ve watched you for many years. You’re an ultra-leftist and you’re a big supporter of Obama,” Klayman said. “Let’s talk about the NSA, let’s not talk about Larry Klayman. This victory is for the American people. It wasn’t for me. And you, as somebody from the left … should appreciate that you don’t have a police state in this country that’s going to be able to intimidate Americans to chill their free speech rights.”
RELATED: Federal judge rules against NSA spying

Friday, December 13, 2013

15 Wedding-Bound Civilians Killed by U.S. Drone


TheDailyBeast.com:
A U.S. drone bombed a wedding-bound convoy in Yemen today, killing 15 civilians and injuring five others, according to Yemeni officials. The bomb “missed its target,” an official said. 

Al Qaeda’s presence in Yemen has led the U.S. to increase its campaign of targeted air strikes, though Washington doesn’t comment on the practice. 

Just four days earlier, a U.S. drone killed three people in eastern Yemen.
RELATED: The Lethal Presidency of Barack Obama

Saturday, November 16, 2013

House Republicans Introduce Resolution to Impeach Attorney General Eric Holder


About freaking time:
A group of congressional Republicans introduced a resolution Thursday to call for the impeachment of Attorney General Eric Holder, alleging Holder had committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” during his tenure as head of the Justice Department.

The resolution was introduced by Rep. Pete Olson, R-Texas, who claims Holder has committed “the offenses of lying to Congress, refusing to comply with a subpoena, and failing to fulfill his oath of office.”

Olson cites Holder’s unwillingness to cooperate during the investigation into the botched Operation “Fast and Furious, his refusal to prosecute those involved IRS targeting of conservative groups, his failure to enforce laws including the Defense of Marriage Act, and his “false testimony” about the DOJ’s monitoring of Fox News journalist James Rosen as articles that are grounds for impeachment.

“For nearly five years, Attorney General Holder has systematically deceived Congress and destroyed the credibility of the Justice Department in the eyes of the American people,” Olson said in a statement.

Olson was joined by 19 other Republican representatives in the resolution.

One House Democrat spoke out against the resolution before it was introduced Thursday, calling it “the most fundamental abuse of the impeachment power.”

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a former federal prosecutor who led the Senate in the impeachment of a federal judge in 2010, said the articles of impeachment in the resolution are simply a list of “debunked conspiracy theories.”
RELATED:  AG Holder asks for appeal in Fast and Furious case holding him in contempt

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 11/10/13

 

Former Homeless Man Loses Benefits For Failing To Report $850 Found On Sidewalk

'Worse Than Hell' In Typhoon-Ravaged Philippines 

Christian Rocker Tops Tim Tebow As Christian Youth Leader 

An Open Letter To Pope Francis

George Will: Other Than Nixon ‘Has There Ever Been a Worse First Year of a Second Term?’

CBS Issues Benghazi Apology

Pew Poll: 60% Oppose Obama on Immigration Reform

Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word 

Unemployment Among Black Youth 393% Higher Than National Rate

Father of Bristol Palin's Son Seeking At Least Equal Custody

White Republican Wins Election By Convincing Voters He’s Black
 

Monday, November 04, 2013

Nobel Prize Winner Barack Obama Tells Aides That He's 'Really Good at Killing People'


Breitbart.com:

A new book chronicling the new 2012 presidential election is reporting that President Obama used to tell his aides that he was "really good at killing people"  referring to U.S. drone strikes.

Mark Haplerin and John Heilmann are authors of the book "Double Down" recount the story.  

Obama oversaw the 2009 surge in Afghanistan, 145 Predator drone strikes in NATO’s 2011 Libya operations, the May 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden, and drone strikes that killed the Pakistani Taliban leader and a senior member of the Somali-based militant group al-Shabab this week.

His administration also expanded the drone war: There have been 326 drone strikes in Pakistan, 93 in Yemen, and several in Somalia under Obama, compared to a total of 52 under George Bush.

In 2011 two of those strikes killed American-born al-Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki and his American-born, 16-year-old son within two weeks.

Jeremy Scahill, author of "Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield" told NBC News that Obama will "go down in history as the president who legitimized and systematized a process by which the United States asserts the right to conduct assassination operations around the world."
RELATED:  This Horrific Statement Should Lose Obama His Nobel Prize

Monday, October 28, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 10/27/13


Witness To Benghazi Recounts Attack

Barack Obama Knew US Spies Were Targeting Angela Merkel

How Can I Get My Kids To Go To Church?

Marriage And Abortion Are Economic Issues

Howard Dean: GOP Also To Blame For Botched Obamacare Rollout

Chris Christie: I Never Hugged Obama

Chris Wallace and Brit Hume Skewer Juan Williams For Defending Obamacare

Fringe Factor: End Homosexuality With a Class Action Lawsuit

Al Gore Strikes Out Again 

TV Has To Be At Least 42 Percent Gay?

Media Hounds Sports Team To Become Politically Correct  

Corporate Executives Join Soros-Backed 'Fly-In' Campaign to Push Amnesty

Wednesday, September 04, 2013

Media Sees Obama's Wars As Good Because He's Not Bush


WashingtonExaminer.com:
If you've noticed that the active anti-war movement seems smaller these days, you're not alone – and just at the moment when the public seems to support their cause.

But those few who have remained consistent, along with a vast and ideologically diverse majority of Americans opposed to war with Syria, must now contend with a media that reflexively assumes purer motives of President Obama than it did of his predecessor.

This is how the media had been dragging us into a war that both Congress and the public view with great skepticism – right up to the moment the British Parliament's vote and extremely sour public opinion forced Obama to un-make his mind about invading without congressional approval.

Witness, for example, the coverage this year and last of Obama’s controversial drone-strike policy. Even while providing reasonably critical coverage, journalists did not hide their shock that Obama – “a good man ... an honorable man ... the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize ... an unimpeachably upstanding citizen,” as Esquire put it – had made mass assassination his singular contribution to the history of the U.S. presidency.

The New York Times, even in revealing Obama's personal role in approving strikes, merely presented this as evidence of his credentials as a deep thinker: “A student of writings on war by Augustine and Thomas Aquinas,” the Times asserted, “he believes that he should take moral responsibility for such actions.”

That provides some insight into the sympathetic assumptions from which the media currently operate and how they have nearly got us into a war last week.

New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan asked her paper’s managing editor, Dean Baquet, about whether Times coverage of Syria isn’t ignoring the lessons of Iraq.

His paraphrased reply: "Syria is not another Iraq, he said. One of the major differences, he said, is that the Obama administration has no enthusiasm for this conflict in the way that President George W. Bush’s administration did a decade ago.”

The drums of war beat to such assumptions, and to the tune of wishful thinking. Time’s Jay Newton-Small penned a post last Wednesday – “Six Ways Syria 2013 is not Iraq 2003.”

Two of her six “reasons” – the robust Arab and European support that Obama supposedly enjoys (Newton-Small sneered: “Remember ‘Freedom Fries?'”) – were falsified within 48 hours of publication.

Jordan refused U.S. access to its airspace and the British Parliament vetoed UK action against Syria. It was the first time Parliament has voted down a government-backed military action since Britain exited our own Revolutionary War. (“Freedom Muffins,” anyone?)

Newton-Small at least brought up one other important difference – the fact that Bush had placed his ill-fated invasion in Congress' hands, whereas Obama at that point had no plans to do so.

“Maybe Obama should allow the debate in Congress,” she conceded, adding that “it’d be a headache,” and referring to the constitutional process of authorizing a war as “posturing.” She was not alone in this characterization.

Yet under great pressure at home and abroad, Obama has now conceded (if not explicitly) that he can't just start foreign wars on his own – a possibility that few journalists ever took seriously, even if polls showed eight in 10 Americans were demanding it.

In 2003, the American public strongly supported the invasion of Iraq (72 percent), and its prospects seemed far more promising at the time than this new venture.

It had an actual goal (regime change), and months (not days) were spent debating the merits. One can only imagine how much more quickly that unwise war might have begun, had the contemporaneous media coverage taken the deferential tone of the Obama era.
RELATED: John Kerry Battles 2004 Version of Himself Over Why Obama is Ignoring Ineffectual U.N.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Bradley Manning Sentenced To 35 Years For Leaks, Now Identifies Himself As A Woman


Now this sick, confused bastard, who broke the law and endangered the lives of millions by leaking 700,000 classified files for all the world to see (because he was angry at the old Bill Clinton "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy) wants President Obama to sign off on getting hormone therapy so he can be a "woman":
A day after being sentenced to 35 years in prison, Army Pfc. Bradley Manning announced in a statement to "Today" that she identifies as female and wants to be known as Chelsea Manning.

"I am Chelsea Manning. I am a female. Given the way that I feel, and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible. I hope that you will support me in this transition. I also request that, starting today, you refer to me by my new name and use the feminine pronoun (except in official mail to the confinement facility). I look forward to receiving letters from supporters and having the opportunity to write back," said Manning.

On Tuesday, David Coombs, Manning's attorney, called on President Obama to pardon Manning or commute her sentence to time served. It was unclear whether Manning identifying as female would change the location of her imprisonment.

During his trial, Manning's attorneys presented evidence that their client struggled with gender identity disorder, a strong feeling of being trapped in the body of the opposite gender. They presented evidence of Manning's struggle that included a picture of the private in a blond wig and lipstick (above).

Manning had argued in court that he was trying to inform the public about military and government wrongdoing when he supplied WikiLeaks with more than 700,000 pages of classified information in 2010, and did not intend to aid the enemy.
RELATED: Bradley Manning wants to live as 'Chelsea.' Will prison go along? (+video)

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Barack Obama Ignores Christians Being Killed In Egypt


It's no secret that Barack Obama's first election in 2008 and re-election in 2012 to POTUS was made through a brilliant strategy enforced by Godless, white liberals, which centered on, amongst other tomfoolery, motivating and placating the vital electoral base within the black community. By having an inexperienced, but half-black POTUS as a face of the nation, white liberals knew that they'd have a better shot at destroying all tenets of Christianity in this country then they would by electing a sometime centrist like the favored and more experienced Hillary Clinton. All the while black Americans continue to be satisfied with having a POTUS who somewhat looks like them, but has proven time and time again that he doesn't give a damn about their true wants and needs. In the meantime, Obama's servitude to the Godless, white, liberal agenda becomes more and more transparent and thus, Christians worldwide continue to suffer because of it:
I urge Cornerites to read Andrew Doran’s article on the homepage comparing the Muslim Brotherhood’s onslaught against Christians in Egypt to Kristallnacht. As you read his account, and as you see pathetic hand-wringing that’s overtaken much of official Washington, think about the following:

Egypt’s active duty military numbers over 450,000 soldiers, and many of them carry American equipment, including American small arms.
Egypt’s army is equipped with more than 2,600 American-designed (and largely American-built) main battle tanks.
Egypt’s air force flies more than 240 American fighters, most of them F-16s.
U.S. aid constitutes 25 percent of Egyptian defense spending.

Now, do you think we don’t have leverage?

As churches burn, as nuns are paraded through the streets by the Muslim Brotherhood, and as Christians across Egypt fear for their lives in the face of the jihadist onslaught, American policy can and should get very simple, very fast: Not one scintilla of aid until the Egyptian military demonstrates — by deeds, not just words — that it is committed to stopping this wave of persecution in its tracks, protecting the most basic human rights of its Christian citizens, and utterly defeating the Muslim Brotherhood. The crisis could escalate quickly to Balkan- or Syrian-level brutality and religious cleansing, but the Egyptian military — well-stocked with equipment we purchased, made, and keep in good repair — is capable of ending the onslaught against Christians.   

The Obama administration’s dance with the Muslim Brotherhood devil is one of the shameful episodes in recent American foreign policy, but we have a chance to correct our mistake before we have no good options left. In other words, before Egypt becomes Syria. The Muslim Brotherhood is our enemy, the Egyptian Christians are victims of jihad, and the American-supplied Egyptian military can and should exercise decisive force.  

It’s past time to call in Egypt’s debt. They may not repay us with money, but they can repay us with actions: Protect Christians and defeat the Muslim Brotherhood, or you’re on your own. 
RELATED: The Uninvited -- Global Persecution of Christians Ignored by Obama Admin

Thursday, August 08, 2013

CNN Report Slams Obama Administration on Benghazi: "Inconsistent, Conflicting, Inaccurate"

Townhall.com:
Perhaps I spoke to soon in criticizing CNN's John King for focusing so much of his Benghazi analysis on Republicans exploiting -- or thinking of exploiting -- the scandal for political purposes.  In a segment that aired as part of the network's special report on the terrorist attack, King was harshly critical of the administration's handling of the massacre and its aftermath:

"There is no disputing this: The explanations have at times been inconsistent, conflicting, and inaccurate ... [Carney soundbyte on single minor change to talking points].  That's just not true.  We now know the National Security Council staff was behind several edits and the State Department pushed others."

In the column I critiqued this morning, King also cites "indefensible" policy decisions carried out by the Clinton State Department in the months and weeks leading up to the raid -- including several attempted attacks on the US diplomatic mission itself:

Nearly a year later, Benghazi remains a flashpoint in Washington for two very different reasons: indefensible pre-attack policy decisions and irresistible post-attack politics. The Obama White House, from the president on down, complains of "phony" Republican-led congressional investigations. Yet the administration's own reluctant, and at times inaccurate, responses to congressional inquiries have contributed to the GOP charge that the administration, at a minimum, has been less than transparent. "We need to get to the bottom of what happened that terrible night, why it happened, and how we can prevent similar tragedies in the future," House Speaker John Boehner said last week in serving notice the House Benghazi investigations would continue into the fall, and include new subpoenas for documents and testimony if necessary. There are legitimate questions about why repeated and specific warnings about the Benghazi security situation were undervalued or ignored.

It's a pretty sure bet that CNN's renewed interest in this story -- including reportage on major new revelations, withering assessments of the administration's conduct, and an interview with a defiant attacker on the ground in Libya -- led to the filing of criminal charges yesterday.  Though many of these questions remain as pertinent today as they were months ago, a new line of inquiry has opened up:  What was the US government really up to in Benghazi?  Why were so many CIA operatives in the city?  How did their operation blow up so badly?  And why were the injured and dying essentially abandoned for nearly a full day?  In light of recent embassy closings, drone strikes, and other threats, this pre-election bravado seems a tad unseemly:
RELATED:  Jay Carney on CNN’s big CIA/Benghazi scoop: I don’t know nothing ’bout nothing

Sunday, August 04, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 8/4/13

Yes, Virginia, You’re A Haven For “Crime Guns”

Pedophile Support Group Seeks 'Truth and Dignity' for Deviants

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Is A Lot More Conservative Than People Think

Sex for Girls' Sake: Porn, Art, or Both? 

Unbelievable: Charlie Rangel Calls Tea Partiers "White Crackers"

Paul Ryan: GOP Plan Says Illegals Go 'On Probation' Then 'Get a Green Card'

Facebook Group Claims ‘Virgin Mary Should Have Aborted’

AP Promotes 'Devout Gay Jew' Drag Queen 

Peter King: Terror Intelligence Suggested 'Enormous' Attack, Possibly in United States

New York Times Sells Boston Globe at 93% Loss

Democratic Party Chief Angers Democrats

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Obama Administration Over NSA’s ‘Unconstitutional And Un-American’ Surveillance


Mediaite.com:
As many pundits have been pointing out over the last several days, the NSA leaks concerning widespread surveillance of all Americans has created some strange bedfellows. But now it has also created some unexpected enemies. The American Civil Liberties Union, often viewed as a liberal institution, has filed a lawsuit against Obama administration officials that claims the NSA’s “dragnet” data collection is illegal and should be stopped.

ACLU spokesperson Alexander Abdo announced the lawsuit on Fox News with Neil Cavuto this afternoon, saying the government “shouldn’t be indiscriminately sweeping up the communications of millions of innocent Americans.” He called the revelations last week about large-scale surveillance programs by the NSA “unconstitutional and un-American.” 

“For 200 years, our government has been able to keep us safe while staying true to” the values in the Constitution, Abdo said. “There’s no reason we need to sacrifice those values now.” When presented with the irony of his organization suing President Obama‘s administration after previously finding so much common ground with Senator Obama, Abdo said the explanation lies in the “seductive” nature of power.

“Power can be seductive and especially in the era of Big Data,” he said, “where it’s increasingly easy for the government to aggregate all sorts of information about Americans.” Abdo added, “It’s understandable that the government is trying to do this, but it’s simply not constitutional.”
RELATED:  In Defense Of Nuance: Edward Snowden Is Both A Criminal And A Laudable Whistleblower

Monday, May 27, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 5/27/13


Tea Party Surges After IRS Flagging

New Terror Stance Worries Republicans

Boy Scouts' Folly: Putting Sexual Morality Up To A Vote

Closing Guantanamo  

Last Dance With Sallie Mae

Petitioners Outraged Lesbian Sex Offender Is Treated Equal Under the Law

Sen. Coburn: Holder Investigating DOJ a ‘Total Conflict of Interest’

Media Claims Pope Gave Atheists Pass into Heaven

Scientist Corrects Gullible Reporter: ‘Climate Change’ Not Causing More Tornadoes

French Gay Marriage Opponents Stage Big Paris March

Mayor's Office No Certainly For Weiner 

Obama Officials Are 'Criminalising Journalism', Says Republican Senator 

Alex Jones Responds To Maddow’s Take Down: ‘I’m Attracted To Mr. Maddow, And That Really Conflicts My…’

Mayor's office no certainty for Weiner
Mayor's office no certainty for Weiner

Thursday, May 23, 2013

NBC Reports Eric Holder Signed Off On Search Of Fox Reporter James Rosen’s Private Emails


Mediaite.com:
According to a report by NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff, Attorney General Eric Holder signed off on the order to issue a warrant on Fox News reporter James Rosen’s communications records. The warrant allowed federal investigators to subpoena Rosen’s private emails as well as to look into his telephone records and those of his family members. 

Rosen, who has not been charged in the case, was nonetheless the target of a search warrant that enabled Justice Department investigators to secretly seized his private emails after an FBI agent said he had “asked, solicited and encouraged … (a source) to disclose sensitive United States internal documents and intelligence information.”  

“It was approved at the highest levels– and I mean the highest,” said one anonymous law enforcement official. 

“Justice officials have since said they do not intend to criminally charge Rosen, but media groups have condemned the issuance of the search warrant itself,” Isikoff writes. 

Isikoff says that his requests for comments from the Department of Justice have not been returned. 
RELATED:  What About When The President Is Republican? Why Liberals Shouldn’t Dismiss The DOJ And IRS Scandals