Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California. Show all posts

Monday, March 10, 2014

'Six Californias' Instead of One?


Townhall.com:
"I love Germany so much that I am glad there are two of them," the French novelist and Nobel laureateFrancois Mauriac commented acerbically during the Cold War. Investor Tim Draper loves California so much that he thinks there should be six of them.

Draper is one of Silicon Valley'ssuperstar venture capitalists, an early funder of numerous high-tech enterprises, including, most famously, Skype and Hotmail. He is also the prime mover behind the "Six Californias" initiative, a proposal to partition the nation's most populous state into six smaller ones. From north to south, those new states would be: Jefferson, North California, Central California, Silicon Valley (including San Francisco), West California (including Los Angeles), and South California.

With 38 million people spread over such a vast and varied territory, Draper argues, a monolithic California has grown ungovernable. The state's population is more than six times as large as the average of the other 49 states, and too many Californians feel estranged from a state government in Sacramento that doesn't understand them or reflect their interests. He is far from the first to say so. Plans to subdivide California have been put forward since the earliest days of statehood in 1850. In an 1859 plebiscite, voters approved by a landslide a proposal to split off Southern California into a separate state. (The measure died in Congress, which was in turmoil over the looming Civil War.)

Can Draper's six-state plan do better? It moved one step closer to plausibility last month, when California's secretary of state gave backers the go-ahead to begin collecting the necessary petition signatures to put "Six Californias" on the ballot. If 808,000 signatures are submitted by July 14, the measure could go to voters in November.

Clearly, a six-way Golden State split is the longest of long shots, and critics aplenty have already started blasting Draper's proposal. But even many of the critics agree that California has become an unwieldy, unmanageable mess.

"No other state contains within it such contradictory interests, cultures, economic and political geography,"writes Keith Naughton at PublicCEO, a website that covers state and local California issues. "It has become impossible to even remotely reconcile the array of opposing forces. The only way to get anything done is to shove laws and regulations down a lot of unwilling throats." In the Los Angeles Times, business columnist Michael Hiltzik claims the economic fallout from the Six Californias plan would be "horrific" — he's especially disturbed that the proposed new state of Central California "would instantly become the poorest state in the nation," while Silicon Valley, where Draper lives, would be one of the wealthiest. Yet Hiltzik concedes that "Californians have lost contact with their government as more budgeting and administration [have] been upstreamed to Sacramento" and as state policies have "taken decision-making for everything from pothole repair to art and music classes out of the hands of the locals."

It's been a long time since an existing state was partitioned into smaller states. It last happened in 1863, when 50 northwestern counties of Virginia were renamed West Virginia and admitted as the 35th state. More than 40 years earlier, Maine, which had been part of Massachusetts since the 1650s, voted overwhelmingly for a divorce, and eventually entered the union as a new state in 1820. In both cases, separation was driven, then embraced, by communities and people who had grown alienated from a state government dominated by interests they didn't share. West Virginia's mountain people had chafed under Richmond's rule, and sharply opposed the formation of the Confederacy. Mainers had long complained that the Legislature in Boston — where Maine was underrepresented — was not only too far away, but too willing to sacrifice their interests to those of Massachusetts.

Maybe those chapters from 19th-century history have no relevance to California today. Or maybe Draper is onto something that shouldn't be dismissed too casually. Last September, in California's rural north, Siskiyou County and Modoc County voted to pursue secession from California and support the creation of a new State of Jefferson. Local residents crowded the Siskiyou board of supervisors' chambers, and when a speaker asked who in the audience favored the idea, the local paper reported, "nearly every hand in the room was raised."

Conventional wisdom says Draper's scheme hasn't got a chance. But venture capitalists have a knack of seeing openings and opportunities that most people miss. Would "Six Californias" would be an improvement over the status quo? That's definitely a debate worth having.
RELATED:  California drought: More than 255,000 homes and businesses still don't have water meters statewide

Monday, February 17, 2014

Barack Obama: California Central Valley Drought Due to Climate Change


Of course, it must be global warming:
While the East Coast and Midwest suffer through a cold and snow-heavy winter, the people of California are in the midst of a drought — and a particularly bad one, even for a state that has regular battles with droughts over the course of my lifetime. Most people don’t recall this, but those of us who grew up with gas rationing in the Golden State during the energy crises of the 1970s also grew up with water rationing, too — including odd/even days for watering lawns and gardens, and request-only glasses of water in restaurants.  Most of Southern California would naturally be a desert if it wasn’t for water management even in the best of years, and the Central Valley would never have become an agricultural powerhouse without it.

Yesterday, Barack Obama came to California’s Central Valley to declare that global warming is what has made the drought so difficult for farmers there:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQzSycdHevU

Actually, the problem for Central Valley farmers is that their water got taken from them by a federal judge, who put a baitfish ahead of human beings. Central Valley’s water-management system was designed to deal with droughts that last as long as five years, but the reservoirs that held its lifeblood got emptied into the ocean to rescue the Delta smelt. It began five years ago, and as Investors Business Daily reports, the locals remember it better than Obama does:
The one thing that will mitigate droughts in California — a permanent feature of the state — is to restore the water flow from California’s water-heavy north to farmers in the central and south. That’s just what House Bill 3964, which passed by a 229-191 vote last week, does.
But Obama’s plan is not to get that worthy bill through the Senate (where Democrats are holding it up) but to shovel pork to environmental activists and their victims, insultingly offering out-of-work farmers a “summer meal plan” in his package.
“We are not interested in welfare; we want water,” Nunes told IBD this week. He and his fellow legislator Valadao are both farmers who represent the worst-hit regions of the Central Valley in Congress and can only look at the president’s approach with disbelief.
“He’s not addressing the situation,” Valadao told us.
“They want to blame the drought for the lack of water, but they wasted water for the past five years,” said Nunes.
The two explain that California’s system of aqueducts and storage tanks was designed long ago to take advantage of rain and mountain runoff from wet years and store it for use in dry years.
But it’s now inactive — by design. “California’s forefathers built a system (of aqueducts and storage facilities) designed to withstand five years of drought,” said Nunes.
“We have infrastructure dating from the 1960s for transporting water, but by the 1990s the policies had changed,” said Valadao.
Environmental special interests managed to dismantle the system by diverting water meant for farms to pet projects, such as saving delta smelt, a baitfish. That move forced the flushing of 3 million acre-feet of water originally slated for the Central Valley into the ocean over the past five years.
In fact, Obama threatened to veto a bill that would have resolved this situation almost exactly two years ago.  Instead, Obama insisted that the environmentalists needed to keep channeling water away from this rich agricultural resource and from the farmers who had worked it for generations, thanks to their own engineering genius at defeating droughts, to pour that water into the Pacific Ocean instead.

This isn’t global warming. It’s what happens when you stop irrigating land by purposefully taking water away. That buck stops at the podium Obama used to blame Gaia and carbon for his own sins of commission and omission.
RELATED:  Obama: I’ll veto bill that will provide water to California’s Central Valley

Sunday, February 02, 2014

Politiks As Usual: In The News 2/2/14

Ann Coulter to Fox & Friends: My Friend’s Sister Died Because of Obamacare

The Republican Suicide Strategy On Immigration

Beyonce By The Book: Rutgers Offers Course On Star 

Obama Doubles Down On Destroying The Economy

US West Faces 'Worst Drought in 500 Years'

Bill Maher: Conservatives to Have Mass Shooting at Country Music Awards

GMA Hypes Christie’s ‘Very Personal Attack’ Against Former Staffer

Parents Warned: Big Brother Owns Your Children

Report: Syria Still Has 96% of Its Chemical Weapons; 83 Killed In Latest Attack

U.S. Taxpayers Fund $52K Study of 16 Schizophrenic LGBT Canadians

2014 Grammys: The Latest Attempt to Push the Liberal Agenda

Maine Supreme Court Locks in Transgender Student Bathroom Rights

5 Wacky Things Liberal Feminists Believe

Monday, October 07, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 10/7/13


Chemical Weapons Experts In Syria Begin Dismantling Assad's Stockpile

Sarah Palin, Football & Lonegan Equals Tea Party Victory!

California’s New Feudalism Benefits a Few at the Expense of the Multitude

Supreme Court Term Begins With Contentious Topics

CNN: Journalism Students Get News From CBS, MSNBC, NBC, NPR, NYT and Jon Stewart

Chris Matthews: Reagan Was A Better President Than Obama

It’s Obvious Why People Don’t Trust ObamaCare

Media Matters Tries to Torpedo Reporter's Matthew Shepard Book

Boehner: Votes Not There For 'Clean' Debt Limit Bill 

The Death of the Hillary Movies

Ted Cruz ‘Long-winded,’ But Wendy Davis a ‘Folk Hero’ 

Obama: Yeah, I’d Think About Changing the Redskins’ Name if I Owned The Team

Monday, March 25, 2013

Politiks As Usual: In The News 3/25/13

Court Shouldn't Rewrite Law On Gay Marriage

Stockton, California Heads To Bankrupt Court

Treasonous Obama Strikes Again 

Meningitis Spreading Via 'Gay' Sex

George W. Bush's Dog Paintings Continue to Impress

More Older Americans Using Marijuana

Politico Avoids Explaining Why Republican Senators Stopped Halligan Circuit Court Nomination

More Pastors Jumping Off the Rock into the Raging Waters

5 Ways To Forfeit Your Man Card

‘Sodomy: We All Have To Pay!’ Coulter Debate On ‘Nannying’ Devolves Into Battle Over Gay Bathhouses

The County Where No One's Gay