‘Just Quit’: Group of Black Political Activists in Chicago Savage Barack Obama’s State of the Union

Mediaite.com:

After watching President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address on Tuesday night, a group of African-Americans were asked for their thoughts on the speech. Their reactions were not favorable toward the president. Most said they believed that their conditions had not greatly improved over the course of his presidency with one of the interviewees even saying that Obama should resign.

According to J.R. Flemming, a member of Chicago’s anti-eviction campaign, the speech was the “same old, same old” and “a bunch of talk and rhetoric to give favor to a dying economy in America.”

“And the reason why our economy is dying is the president’s approach is always to place blame,” he continued. “It’s not the 1 percent problem, it’s not the 99 percent problem, it’s an American problem. And the problem is patronage, nepotism and cronyism.”

Obama has been “more hurtful to the black race than he has been helpful,” added Voices of Ex-Offenders (V.O.T.E.) founder Joe Watkins. “But those of us at the bottom of the ladder don’t accept that.”

“Just quit,” Mark Carter added, “because if this is what you call helping us, then just stop helping us.”

RELATED: Race Gap: Blacks Fall Further Behind Under Obama

ESPN Host Stephen Smith: "It Makes No Sense Black Conservatives Are Pariahs in Our Communities"

Newsbusters.org:

During most segments of First Take, a weekday program aired on the ESPN sports network, the discussion focuses on a wide variety of topics ranging from football to basketball and even golf. However, on Friday morning, co-host Stephen Smith addressed the subject of race-related politics.

Responding to a feud between Cleveland Browns running back Jim Brown and Los Angeles Laker Kobe Bryant regarding their knowledge of the black culture in the U.S., Smith declared:  “It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever” that black conservatives “are considered pariahs and are ostracized in our communities.”

The clash between the football and basketball stars started a week earlier, when Brown was a guest on Arsenio Hall's new weekday talk show on Wednesday, when he charged that Bryant “is confused” about black American culture because he grew up in Italy. 

After stating that he thought Brown's remarks were "surprising," Bryant responded with this tweet: “A 'Global' African American is an inferior shade to 'American' African Americans?? #hmmm … that doesn't sound very #Mandela or #DrKing, sir.” 

Then on Friday, Smith told First Take co-host Skip Bayless that he spoke with Kobe before that tweet was sent, and Bryant told him that this is “not a conversation that he’s running from. He welcomes the opportunity to have that conversation.”

Smith then noted:

When it comes to the African-American community, you have a plethora of individuals. For example, the black population hasn't given the Republican Party more than 15 percent of its vote since 1964. 

And anybody who is deemed a black conservative, I am not one of them -- I'm a registered Independent, just to get that out of the way -- but those I know who are black conservatives are considered pariahs and are ostracized in our communities, and it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

The sportscaster and columnist then used the Brown/Bryant flap to illustrate what he considers a partisan political dynamic within the black community:

But this is how -- this is a problem that exists within our community. Because you are from our community, everybody believes that everybody is supposed to be identical to one another, and we can’t display or exercise any kind of versatility, alright, or range in our thinking. 

It’s a problem that we have to deal with. It’s an internal problem that exists, and we’re going to have to handle it because if we don’t, we’re gonna see more Jim Browns speaking out against more Kobe Bryants, and we’re gonna see more Kobe Bryants retaliating against the likes of Jim Brown.

RELATED: Kobe Bryant fires back at Jim Brown, defending his upbringing

Idiot Black Liberal ESPN Host Rob Parker Suspended After Questioning Robert Griffin III's 'Blackness'

Oh to be a black liberal in 2012: never openly criticize Obama, vote Democrat even if you have no clue about the ideas that really matter, continue to be brainwashed by the white liberals on MSNBC, hate FOX News (without ever actually watching it), cherish entitlements, never date outside your race, blame everything bad that happens to your life or others on "whitey keeping you down" (aka Republicans) and "keep it real" at all times, even if it's to the detriment of you and your community at large:

Commentator Rob Parker has been suspended indefinitely by ESPN after he questioned Robert Griffin III's blackness on the television show "First Take" on Thursday.

“Following yesterday’s comments Rob Parker has been suspended until further notice,” ESPN spokesman Mike Soltys said. “We are conducting a full review.”

Parker apparently did not think that there would be any repercussions for his racially charged remarks, which included him asking whether Griffin was a "brother" or a "cornball brother."

Parker responded to a tweet Thursday which said "Good luck in your next line of work!" by writing: "Typical silly response. Watch me on First Take tomorrow and Sat.#pleze."

Parker has not tweeted since his suspension was announced.

Parker questioned Griffin's racial identity because the Washington Redskins star is engaged to a white woman and may be a Republican.

“He’s black, he kind of does his thing, but he’s not really down with the cause; he’s not one of us,” Parker said. “He’s kind of black, but he’s not really the kind of guy you want to hang out with 'cause he’s off to something else.”

Griffin's father, Robert Griffin II, weighed in on Parker's comments on Thursday.

“I wouldn’t say it’s racism," he told USA Today. "I would just say some people put things out there about people so they can stir things up.”

RELATED: An Open Letter to Rob Parker

Jamie Foxx Blurts Out How Black Liberals Really Think, Calls Barack Obama "Our Lord and Savior"

Indeed, with Black liberals assisting termendously in Barack Obama's re-election a few weeks ago, give talented comedian/actor/singer Jamie Foxx credit for just telling the truth: for merely existing as a half-Black, two-term President, in the eyes of many naive and ass-backwards-thinking Black liberals, Barack Obama has replaced Jesus Christ as their "Lord and Savior", furnishing "great gifts" in the form of record food stamps, welfare, unprecedented unemployment loot and a host of other entitlements. Lazy Black liberals would never give that up and they certainly didn't come out in force for Obama again this year because Barry cares about real needs in the urban community. Props to Jamie Foxx for giving truth to power:

Oh, Jamie Foxx. 

The comedian caused quite a stir at the 2012 Soul Train Awards, which was televised last night but taped in Las Vegas a few days after the 2012 election, when he made an out-of-this-world comparison regarding the president.

"It's like church over here. It's like church in here. First of all, give an honor to God and our Lord and Savior Barack Obama. Barack Obama," Foxx said to the audience.

The president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights in the United States Bill Donahue released a statement regarding the actor's comment, saying, "Foxx's epiphany is startling. It just goes to show that even though Obama did not succeed in stopping the oceans from rising (as he promised to do in 2008), he did succeed in convincing Jamie Foxx, and no doubt legions of others, that God exists. Whether God can survive an ACLU lawsuit accusing him of violating church and state grounds remains to be seen."

Foxx's rep was not immediately available for comment.

RELATED: Hannity Panel Battles Over Jamie Foxx Calling President Obama ‘Our Lord And Savior’

Alan Keyes Quote of the Day!

"Of course, Obama's 2008 victory also depended on virtually unanimous support from many black Americans. Among them were professing Christians, who put aside every consideration of faith and conscience to support someone dedicated to socialism, rooted in the God-erasing ideology of scientific materialism. This dedication led him to take stands on moral issues (like abortion and the law-enforced acceptance of homosexuality) that outrage and directly assault the tenets of the biblical faith these black Christians otherwise profess. But for Obama's sake, they put the idol of false racial pride above their respect for God and His word."

-  conservative political activist and author Alan Keyes

Politiks As Usual: In The News 6/25/12

Romney Camp Fights Claims of Shipping Jobs Overseas

Obama’s Great American Novel 

Charles Barron, Black Racist and New York's Next Democratic Congressman 

Republicans Missing Chance on Education Reform

Soros-Funded Activist Gave Reagan Portrait The Finger At White House

CNN’s Belief Blog: ‘Can ‘True Catholics’ Support Same Sex Marriage?’

Howard Kurtz Scolds Andrea Mitchell for Expressing 'No Regret' for 'Deceptively Edited' Romney Video

Reuters Poll: 73% of Independents Oppose Obamacare

Obama Congratulates Muslim Brotherhood Leader

Missing The Point on Fast and Furious

Chris Matthews Explains How Obama Went From Black To White In 2008 Campaign

Video: Green-tech Stimulus Recipient Went Broke … A Second Time

Video: Follow The Ideology

Van Jones Says Even If Obama Were Gay Blacks Would Vote For Him

HuffPo.com:

Former White House adviser Van Jones thinks President Obama has already locked up the support of black voters ahead of the 2012 elections, regardless of his views on gay marriage.


"I think if President Obama came out as gay he wouldn't -- President Obama is not going to lose the black vote no matter what he does," Jones quipped Monday on MSNBC, responding to a question from host Alex Wagner about a potential loss of support among African Americans if Obama came out in favor of marriage equality.


"I don't understand this particular strategy," Jones continued. "Certainly, our numbers are a little bit more -- because we're more religious as a community -- a little bit softer on some of this stuff, but it's not a hardcore issue for that many African Americans. In fact, I don't even understand the argument that gay marriage is a threat to marriage."


Wagner then suggested that Obama "is, of course, in support of gay marriage," but couldn't express this belief publicly because of some sort of political pressure or calculation.

For once, Van Jones is right. With the majority of Black Americans voting Democrat because they are afraid to leave the dependency-induced, white-run, morally-bankrupt, social liberal plantation, black liberals would still be so proud of having a half-black President that the majority will pull the lever for him come November no matter what happens and that includes being gay.

Politiks As Usual: In The News 3/26/12

U.S. Gives $860,000 To Afghan Families

Health Care Law Brawl Arrives At Supreme Court Steps

The Dark, Intolerant, And Abusive Nature Of The Gay Agenda

Santorum Beats Romney By 22 Points In Louisiana

Cheney Waited Longer Than Average For Heart Transplant

Black Panthers: $10,000 To 'Capture' Trayvon's Killer

John Heilemann: Bush v. Gore Ruling 'Pure Politics and Purely Corrupt'

CBS’s O’Donnell Hits Ryan With White House Talking Points, Then Cues Up Softballs to Schumer

Green Is Taking Us For A Ride

Beware Of The Mob, Hey, Remember When High Gas Prices Were All Bush’s Fault?

Obama Campaign Capitalizes On Foul-mouthed Biden With Profane T-shirts

Soledad O’Brien And Breitbart’s Joel Pollak Clash Over Critical Race Theory

Mediaite.com:

CNN’s Starting Point got heated Thursday as Breitbart.com’s Editor-In-Chief Joel Pollak clashed with host Soledad O’Brien about the significance of the video of President Obama hugging a Harvard professor. O’Brien didn’t quite understand why the recently publicized video was a “bombshell.”


“What part of that was the bombshell? Because I missed it. I don’t get it,” O’Brien exclaimed. “What was a bombshell?”


“Well, the bombshell is the revelation of the relationship between Obama and Derrick Bell,” Pollak pointed out.


“Okay, so he’s a Harvard Law student and a Harvard Law Professor, yeah.” O’Brien added.


“Derrick Bell is the Jeremiah Wright of academia,” Pollak stated. “He passed away last year, but during his lifetime, he developed a theory called critical race theory, which holds that the civil rights movement was a sham and that white supremacy is the order and it must be overthrown.”


“So that is a complete misreading,” O’Brien interrupted. “I’ll stop you there for a second — then I’ll let you continue. That is a complete misreading of critical race theory. That’s an actual theory. You could Google it and some would give you a good definition. So that’s not correct. But keep going.”


“In what way is it a critical misreading?” Pollak countered. “Can you explain to me? Explain to your readers (sic) what it is,”


“I’m going to ask you to continue on,” O’Brien quickly replied. “I’m just going to point out that that is inaccurate. Keep going. Tell me what the bombshell is. I haven’t seen it yet.”


“Well, wait a minute!” Pollak interjected. “You’ve made a claim that my characterization of critical race theory as the opposite of Martin Luther King is inaccurate. You’re telling your viewers that, but you’re not telling them what it is.”


“Critical race theory looks into the intersection of race and politics and the law and as a legal academic who would study this and write about it, he would advance the theory about what exactly happened when the law was examined in terms of racial politics,” O’Brien explained. “There is no white supremacy in that. It is a theory. It’s an academic theory and as one of the leading academics at Harvard Law School, he was one of the people as part of that conversation. So that is a short definition.”


“I’m glad we’ve got you saying that on tape because that’s a complete misrepresentation,” Pollak hit back. “Critical race theory is all about white supremacy. Critical race theory holds that civil rights laws are ineffective, that racial equality is impossible, because the legal and Constitutional in America is white supremacist.”


The two argued over the relevancy of critical race theory to the conversation, with O’Brien trying to move things back to the “bombshell” and Pollak saying, “You can’t derail this, Soledad.” O’Brien eventually concluded that Pollak wanted to make the connection between Obama and the “radical” Bell. Pollak accused O’Brien of obfuscating the real issue, which was the media sweeping things under the rug, and O’Brien began to accuse Pollak of still not understanding critical race theory.


Then Panelist Jay Thomas interjected. He asked if Pollak was afraid that a secret black movement was going to rise up and murder him. Pollak responded by saying he was just accused of being a racist and afraid of black people, but answered Thomas’ query anyway.


“At every point in his life when he could have followed the path of Martin Luther King, he threw in his lot with the Jeremiah Wrights and the Derrick Bells of the world,” Pollak said.


GBTV’s Amy Holmes then chimed in, wondering why the raw video didn’t surface in 2008.


“Of what?!” O’Brien exclaimed. “Of hugging Derrick Bell, the renowned Harvard Law Professor?”


Holmes countered by saying that it should have been something, “for the public to decide, not the media to decide,” and that the media, “did not allow this to be put into the public square.” She then made a stellar observation that she was a vegetarian in college and now enjoys prime rib. It’s not about digging something up on Obama, Holmes explained, it’s about the media not putting it out there.

What a lying, condescending prick that Soledad is. Anyone who ever prescribed to critical race theory in college knows full damn well that it heavily involved white supremacy semantics.

RELATED: Video: CNN beclowns itself painting Breitbart editor-in-chief as racist